| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Marbury v Madison

Page history last edited by John Dong 13 years, 11 months ago

Marbury v Madison (1803): A landmark decision made by the Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice, John Marshall, Marbury v Madison forever cemented the relationship between the different branches of the government by placing the power of “judicial review” firmly in the hand of the judicial branch. In a desperate last ditch attempt to secure some power for the Federalists, the Adams administration signed a number of judicial commissions into effect. William Marbury was intended to receive the position of the justice of peace of the District of Columbia, but the new Secretary of States, Madison, refused to send out the official commission Marbury with the job. Incensed, Marbury then took his case to the Supreme Court, thereby forcing Marshall between a rock and a hard place. Marshall knew that if he tried to advance the Marbury’s case, he would face total rejection by the Democratic Republican, while weakening the power of the entire Judicial Branch. To find a political middle ground, Marshall dismissed Marbury’s suit by arguing that the Judicial Act of 1789 was partially unconstitutional. Even through Marbury lost his commission, Marshall was able to pull a major victory out of the seeming defeat by setting a precedent under which the court had the final interpretation of the Constitution.                               John D.

 

Sources: The American Pageant, 12th edition

             http://www.historycentral.com/NN/Marbury.html (American History Central)

             http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/democracy/landmark_marbury.html  (PBS) 

Interesting Links:

       To read the transcript of Marbury Vs Madison, visit Our Documents at:

             http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=old&doc=19&page=transcript

Quote From Marshall's Decision

 

Commented On:

Zebulon Pike (6)

Aaron Burr(2)

Battle of Tippecanoe (2)

 

Comments (5)

Camilo Ruiz said

at 10:01 pm on Oct 5, 2010

The specific part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that John Marshall declared unconstitutional was the abiliy to order a public official to complete his job directly through the Supreme Court. Because the Constitution stated that original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court had to involve either a diplomat or two or more states, Marshall declared the ability to charge any public official unconstitutional. Thus, since Marbury had based his case to the Supreme Court on the Judiciary Act of 1789, and since James Madison, the defendant, was neither a diplomat nor a state, Chief Justice John Marshall dismissed the Marbury vs. Madison case. Also, the precedent that you refer to which gives the judiciary branch the power to interpret the constitution is known as judical review. Camilo Ruiz -- Period 2

Kyle R said

at 10:05 pm on Oct 5, 2010

wow way to go John dong! this helped a lot considering i have trouble following the case; also to put it in lymanse terms maddison could not find his original doc. of representation therefore he was taken to court.
kyle rumsey
Per.2

brendalyn said

at 4:03 pm on Oct 6, 2010

Marbury lost the case but in the bigger picture he created who truely declared what was unconstituional or not, creating judicial review. awesome defintion.

brendalyn pd.4

Valeria Solis said

at 8:17 pm on Oct 6, 2010

great definition!
heres some more information on the case : http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/marbury.HTML

Lauren Niedzielski said

at 9:09 pm on Oct 6, 2010

good definition! if you want to read some more about this case: http://www.school.eb.com/eb/article-9050769?query=marubry%20vs.%20madison&ct=
Lauren Niedzielski-period 1

You don't have permission to comment on this page.